Sarcoidosis.com.au

Respiratory Lab | Referral Forms | Useful links | Wesley Hospital
Sarcoidosis Overview | Images in sarcoidois | Sarcoidosis in detail |
Asbestos | Pleural plaques | Asbestosis | Lung cancer | Mesothelioma |
Asthma | Bronchiectasis | COAD | Emphysema |
Silicosis |
Poetry I | Hobbies and quotes | In honour of my father | Queensland Pioneers
Sarcoidosis publications | Medical Publications | General Publications | Outside the square | French publications | Greek Publications
subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link | subglobal7 link
Notice boardsmall logo

Possible cause of Sarcoidosis

The research article "The Cause of Sarcoidosis: the Centurial enigma solved" (Heffner DK. Annals of Diagnostic Pathology 2007; 142-152) outlines the possible causes of sarcoidosis. The abstract of the article has been posted for your information.

I am an experienced pathologist (4 decades), and I can now confidently perceive the cause of sarcoidosis. I can see clearly now because of 2 things: (1) modern evidence indicating a genetic-based immune dysregulation as an essential predisposing causal cofactor and (2) a century of accumulated pathology observations relevant to the point. The first factor helps explain numerous environmental, clinical, and research uncertainties, contradictions, and puzzles. The second factor, not readily available to clinicians, allows me to perceive the answer. The argument: (1) although most pathologists are vague in their conception of a "granuloma," the discerning pathologist realizes that a "true," well-formed epithelioid granuloma has only a very limited number of possible causes; (2) these causes do not include autoimmune diseases nor "self-perpetuating" granulomas to a "cleared" infectious agent; (3) the only feasible 2 causes are an infection or a reaction to a foreign particulate; (4) the only possible infections are ones where the infectious agent can be seen under the microscope; (5) experienced infectious disease pathologists do not see a microorganism (after a century of looking); (6) foreign particulates are therefore the cause (the only feasible cause remaining). This is not a new speculation; what I contribute that is new are pathology perceptions that confirm it beyond speculation. The reason the particles are not seen microscopically is that they are nanoparticles (less than a micrometer in largest dimension); larger particles are cleared from the lung efficiently by mucociliary transport. Direct evidence for this nanoparticulate theory is abundant. A recent case I studied has some compelling details. The nanoparticle theory should be accepted and acted upon, guiding further research, and there are risk-free measures that probably could benefit patients now.
© 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

 

Wesley Research Institute

Dr Allen recently appeared on the Wesley Research Institute Newsletter, which can be downloaded by clicking on the image below.

Wesley Rearsearch Newsletter

 

 

 

DISCLAIMER
The material on this website is for your information only. Whilst we have taken all reasonable steps to ensure the accuracy and completeness of contents of this website, to the extent permitted by applicable law, the author accepts no responsibility for loss suffered as a result of any reliance on any part of its contents. Any medical information on this website is not intended as a substitute for informed medical advice. Prof. Roger Allen is not responsible for the content of any linked site, changes or updates. Links are provided for your convenience inclusion does not imply endorsement.

About Us | Contact us | Site Map | ©2010 Prof. Roger K. A. Allen